![]() There’s now an improved grip, which is 6.5mm deeper and is 15% bigger overall – you may still find that your little finger dangles precariously off the bottom edge of the camera if your hands are on the large size, but it’s certainly a more comfortable experience. The result is that shooting with the A6600 is a far nicer experience than its predecessor. Here’s where Sony has made a couple of small but important tweaks. ![]() Related: Sony Alpha A6500 review Sony A6600 vs A6500 – Design and screen So is it worth splashing out? Both models feature a 24.2-megapixel APS-C sensor paired with a Bionz X processor, which suggests image quality should be similar. Still, that £300 isn’t an insignificant sum it’s money that you could be putting towards a lens, another accessory, or even a trip away. It isn’t too extreme, though: at the time of writing, the A6600 will likely set you back approx £300 more than the A6500. ![]() In true Sony style, it hasn’t actually been that long since the previous flagship was unveiled, so it’s worth comparing the two side by side to see which is worthy of your investment.Īs you might expect, the newer model comes at a price premium. Sony’s APS-C range of cameras may not have been grabbing the headlines to the degree of its full-frame offerings, but it’s the former models that the majority of consumers actually buy – and a new flagship camera has been announced in the form of the Sony A6600.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |